By Tim Smith ’26
On March 2, THINK partnered with Media Studies and the AC Environmentalists to host a screening event that explored how TV and filmmaking can shape our understanding of climate change. We watched a conversation between writers Quinta Brunson (Abbott Elementary) and Matt Murray (The Good Place), followed by an episode of Abbott Elementary and Grey’s Anatomy to see how each show weaves in climate‑related themes, specifically extreme heat. Brunson and Murray talked about how writers introduce complicated or controversial issues and the unique power comedies have to spark conversations without feeling heavy. They also touched on the simple, practical steps studios can take to make their productions more sustainable. These ideas aren’t just useful in Hollywood: They’re things we can use in our daily lives, too.
One of TV’s biggest strengths is relatability. Characters feel human; they deal with everyday problems, make questionable decisions, and sometimes don’t even realize it. One week a character is the voice of reason, and the next they’re the villain. Those flaws help audiences attach themselves to a show. That attachment opens the door for writers to introduce bigger ideas without viewers feeling preached at. If an episode made climate change the entire focus, it might feel forced. In real life, major issues affect us, but that doesn’t mean they’re all we think about. A show that makes its whole world revolve around climate change wouldn’t feel realistic for most viewers.
Most people are wrapped up in their own smaller problems — sick pets, rent coming due, noisy neighbors. Those things demand attention right now, while bigger issues often stay in the background. Episodic shows take advantage of this dynamic, letting characters deal with everyday annoyances while still dropping in larger themes over time. Abbott Elementary does this well: environmental issues appear in passing, shaping the world of the show without taking over the characters’ lives. Brunson pointed to an example from the second episode, where the teachers juggle faulty lights, bad recipes, and the usual student chaos. During a break, they casually mention the heat that day. The principal, Ava, blurts out, “Why is it February and hotter than the devil’s booty-hole outside?” It lets the audience recognize the influence of extreme heat without pulling them out of the story. The small personal problems still drive the episode; climate change just adds an extra layer they have to deal with.
We can use that same approach in our own conversations. If I tell a friend I’m changing plans because a hailstorm is coming, I don’t need to launch into a full explanation about climate change. Just like in the episode, I can acknowledge it in a casual way: “Yeah, these hailstorms have been getting huge lately. I swear I saw a softball‑sized chunk of ice this year.” That’s enough to make the connection without turning the whole conversation into a debate.
Normalizing these small moments can help us and the people around us better understand how climate change shows up in everyday life. While Brunson and Murray hope to guide large audiences toward that awareness, we can use the same low‑pressure approach in our own circles. Over time, it can help make conversations about climate change feel more natural and less touchy. Matt mentioned that it used to be nearly impossible to talk about in Hollywood, but now, it’s just part of the landscape. Maybe we can help make the same shift in our everyday lives.












